Finest Building Accounting Software program for Builders in 2025

I’ve by no means labored a day in building. I’ve by no means pored over blueprints, managed subcontractors, or fearful about materials prices. However I do know this: managing cash in any enterprise is tough, and building is a unique beast.

The primary time I researched the most effective building accounting software program options, I used to be struck by how totally different they’re from customary accounting instruments. I got here throughout phrases (progress billing, job costing, retainage) that don’t seem in a typical accounting software program tutorial. I imagined a contractor juggling undertaking deadlines, shock bills, and alter orders whereas additionally making an attempt to maintain observe of invoices and payroll. No marvel so many building companies wrestle to remain worthwhile.

That’s the place the greatest building accounting software program makes all of the distinction. It’s designed particularly for the {industry}, serving to contractors, builders, and undertaking managers exactly observe each greenback. The perfect ones assist companies keep away from monetary pitfalls earlier than they occur.

So, after digging deep into the numerous building accounting software program choices, I’ve rounded up the most effective ones obtainable right this moment. Whether or not you’re a small contractor on the lookout for a easy answer or a big agency that wants highly effective integrations, I’ll provide help to discover the fitting match.

Save huge with these 7 building accounting software program options I examined

I see building accounting software program as a specialised software designed to deal with the distinctive monetary wants of building companies. In contrast to common accounting software program, it contains options like job costing, progress billing, and subcontractor administration, making monitoring undertaking bills and profitability simpler. From what I’ve realized, it helps contractors keep on prime of budgets, funds, and compliance with out getting misplaced in spreadsheets.

From what I’ve seen, the most effective building accounting software program makes managing funds within the building {industry} rather more environment friendly. It helps observe prices in actual time, making certain that tasks keep on funds. These accounting options for building simplify payroll, even when employees have totally different pay charges throughout a number of job websites. The best software program automates invoicing and billing based mostly on undertaking milestones, decreasing handbook work. Most significantly, it offers clear monetary insights so building companies could make higher choices and keep away from surprising prices.

Before you purchase building accounting software program, see how I evaluated them

Right here’s what I thought-about whereas testing the most effective building accounting software program.

• Job costing and funds monitoring: I’ve seen that building accounting software program must transcend customary bookkeeping and supply detailed job costing options. I need to break down prices associated to supplies, labor, subcontractors, and gear to see precisely the place cash is spent on every undertaking. If a software can observe prices in actual time, that’s even higher as a result of it helps keep away from funds overruns. Some software program additionally contains cost-to-complete forecasting, which helps predict a undertaking’s value based mostly on present bills. With out robust job prices, a building firm would possibly wrestle to remain worthwhile.
• Information safety and compliance: Dealing with monetary information comes with dangers, so I all the time take a look at the safety measures in place. Sturdy encryption (like AES-256), multi-factor authentication (MFA), and role-based entry management (RBAC) are important to guard delicate monetary information. Since building companies usually cope with giant contracts, compliance with {industry} requirements like SOC 2, GDPR (for worldwide tasks), or IRS rules for tax reporting can also be essential. If a software program supplier doesn’t clearly define their safety protocols, that’s a pink flag.
• Actual-time monetary reporting: I need instantaneous entry to monetary information with out pulling a number of spreadsheets collectively. The perfect building accounting software program gives real-time reporting so I can rapidly test a undertaking’s monetary well being. This contains dashboards with key metrics like funds vs. precise prices, revenue margins, and excellent invoices. Some superior options additionally present money circulation projections and automatic alerts when bills exceed budgets. 
• Multi-entity and multi-currency help: Multi-entity accounting is important for building companies working throughout a number of areas or dealing with worldwide tasks. I test whether or not the software program permits managing separate financials for various subsidiaries, job websites, or divisions inside one system. Multi-currency help is one other vital issue. The software program ought to robotically deal with trade charges and monetary reporting in several currencies if an organization works with worldwide suppliers or contractors. With out these options, companies could wrestle to maintain their financials organized at scale.
• Actual-time collaboration and role-based entry: Actual-time collaboration is vital since building tasks contain a number of stakeholders: contractors, subcontractors, and accountants. I test if the software program permits role-based entry, that means totally different staff members can entry solely the monetary information related to them. For instance, undertaking managers would possibly must view budgets however not payroll particulars. Some software program additionally helps audit trails, which observe adjustments made to monetary information, making certain accountability and safety. 
• Enterprise intelligence instruments: Fundamental accounting reviews aren’t all the time sufficient, so I test whether or not the software program contains superior analytics and enterprise intelligence (BI) instruments. Options like customizable dashboards, drill-down reviews, and information visualization assist companies acquire deeper monetary insights. Some high-end options combine with BI platforms like Tableau or Energy BI, permitting customers to create customized monetary reviews. If a system solely offers static reviews with out customization choices, it won’t be highly effective sufficient for rising companies that want detailed monetary evaluation.
• Tax and compliance automation: Building accounting entails advanced tax calculations, together with gross sales tax, payroll tax, and project-based tax liabilities. I test if the software program can robotically calculate and file taxes, making certain compliance with native, state, and federal rules. Some options even provide W-9 and 1099 monitoring, simplifying contractor funds and tax reporting. If tax compliance options are lacking, companies would possibly face penalties or spend additional time on handbook tax submitting.

To be included within the building accounting software program class, a product should:

• Concentrate on accounting options tailor-made solely for the development {industry} moderately than catering to a number of sectors
• Ship monetary administration instruments particularly designed to satisfy the wants of building companies
• Present accounting insights on the particular person undertaking and general firm ranges
• Create monetary reviews that adjust to {industry} rules, threat administration requirements, and security pointers

*This information was pulled from G2 in 2025. Some evaluations could have been edited for readability.  

I can see how Procore’s real-time undertaking value monitoring could possibly be helpful. It seems to assist monitor budgets, change orders, and precise prices, making it simpler to remain on prime of a undertaking’s monetary well being. In contrast to some platforms the place value monitoring can really feel disjointed, Procore reportedly consolidates all monetary information in a single place, decreasing the possibilities of discrepancies. This type of system appears worthwhile in stopping funds overruns and surprising prices.

I perceive that managing change orders and not using a centralized system could be a nightmare. Procore is designed to streamline this course of, permitting customers to create, observe, and approve change orders with out counting on a number of spreadsheets or infinite electronic mail chains. Because the system information each adjustment, it enhances accountability and minimizes disputes with subcontractors or shoppers.

I like Procore’s capacity to simplify submitting and reviewing fee functions. Lowering paperwork and imposing a structured submission course of helps subcontractors get their functions proper the primary time. Automated monitoring of invoices and funds would even be helpful in avoiding missed or duplicate funds, which could be a widespread difficulty in building accounting.

Procore’s most often talked about power is its capacity to preserve detailed compliance information. A system that logs each doc, approval, and monetary transaction could make audits smoother. I like which you can digitally retailer every thing as an alternative of manually sorting by means of piles of paperwork to discover a previous transaction.

A typical frustration I’ve heard is the restricted customization choices for monetary reviews. Whereas Procore offers customary templates, they don’t all the time match particular reporting wants. Many customers export information to different instruments simply to format reviews as wanted, which provides pointless steps and reduces the effectivity of an built-in accounting system.

One other problem I’ve seen reported is that many subcontractors wrestle with Procore, particularly when submitting invoices or updating monetary info. Since some subcontractors nonetheless choose conventional strategies like paper invoices or emails, it may be troublesome to make use of the software program’s capabilities totally. This may create friction and sluggish monetary processes if additional steering is required.

Whereas Procore’s cell app works nicely for field-related duties, I’ve seen customers complain about its restricted monetary administration options on cell gadgets. Customers usually must approve invoices or test monetary reviews on the go, however some key options will not be as simply accessible as on a desktop. Switching to a laptop computer for sure duties appears inconvenient, but it surely could possibly be higher with a extra strong cell interface.

What I dislike about Procore:

• I don’t like that the cell expertise isn’t as easy appropriately for monetary duties. If key options are more durable to entry on a cell system, that may be a significant inconvenience, particularly when making fast monetary choices within the discipline.
• I’d discover it irritating to export monetary information simply to get reviews within the format I would like. Whereas Procore gives customary reporting templates, they don’t all the time present the pliability wanted for custom-made monetary evaluation.

What G2 customers dislike about Procore:

“There are difficulties in customization and points with cell app performance.”

– Procore Assessment, Matthew Ricci R.

One factor I worth in building accounting software program is the power to handle paperwork effectively. From what I’ve seen, Deltek ComputerEase gives a technique to retailer and fasten monetary information, invoices, and payroll paperwork in a single place. That may be an enormous benefit in an {industry} the place dropping a crucial doc could cause main delays. I can think about how a lot simpler it could be to drag up information with out digging by means of a number of recordsdata or folders.

Working tasks in a number of areas could be a logistical nightmare, so having software program that retains financials streamlined can be a giant deal. From what I perceive, Deltek ComputerEase makes it attainable to observe job prices throughout totally different websites in a means that retains every thing organized. I understand how troublesome it may be to handle bills for a number of tasks without delay, so with the ability to separate monetary information whereas nonetheless conserving it beneath one system sounds extremely helpful. 

I additionally like that Deltek ComputerEase offers detailed value monitoring, permitting firms to exactly monitor labor, supplies, and overhead. That perception can be extraordinarily helpful when staying inside funds and avoiding surprising bills. Automated value allocation may additionally cut back human error, which is all the time a priority when coping with monetary information.

Deltek ComputerEase handles payroll calculations robotically, making an allowance for totally different pay charges, extra time guidelines, and union rules. It may save rather more time than manually getting into all that information. Licensed payroll reporting is one other function that stands out to me since compliance is such a giant difficulty within the {industry}. That is an interesting choice if an organization must course of payroll for a number of crews rapidly and precisely.

I’ve seen that sure accounting capabilities like adjusting accounts receivable (AR) common ledger entries or reconciling accounts appear to require a number of steps that might sluggish issues down. I do know from expertise that additional clicks and menu navigation can add up, turning easy duties into tedious ones.

I like having choices, however there’s a effective line between versatility and pointless complexity. Deltek ComputerEase gives many options, however I can see how that is likely to be a draw back for some companies. I understand how simple it’s to get misplaced in a system that tries to do every thing, particularly if most of the options aren’t related to my wants.

What I dislike about Deltek ComputerEase:

• From what I’ve seen, some accounting duties in Deltek ComputerEase, like adjusting AR common ledger entries or reconciling accounts, appear to require extra effort than essential.
• Deltek ComputerEase tries to cowl a number of floor, which may overwhelm firms that don’t want each perform. I understand how simple it’s to get misplaced in a system providing too many instruments, particularly if many aren’t related to the enterprise.

What I dislike about Deltek ComputerEase:

“I want updating the AR common ledger was less complicated. I don’t like updating each deposit or ACH fee. Initially, the software program helped minimize my financial institution reconciliation time by half till we signed up for Invoice and Pay. I’m again to spending two hours on financial institution reconciliation each month. Invoice and Pay deposits sure quantities individually however doesn’t enable me to import a breakdown of which funds had been included day by day, making it troublesome to match deposits precisely.”

– Deltek ComputerEase Assessment, Jessica M.

I see how GCPay considerably reduces the handbook effort required to handle compliance paperwork and funds. As an alternative of chasing down lien waivers, insurance coverage certificates, and different paperwork, the system ensures every thing is in place earlier than processing funds. This is able to decrease the danger of compliance points and make audits far much less hectic.

One in every of GCPay’s largest benefits is the power to immediately test the standing of invoices and funds with out fixed follow-ups. I count on this to cut back the necessity for back-and-forth emails and cellphone calls between common contractors and subcontractors. If everybody concerned can log in and see precisely the place issues stand, that ought to decrease disputes and miscommunication.

I’ve gathered that GCPay helps eradicate widespread invoicing errors by making certain subcontractors submit correctly formatted pay functions. That alone may stop a number of frustration since bill errors usually result in fee delays and additional work for accounting groups.

Retainage monitoring has all the time been an advanced a part of building funds, so it is smart that GCPay’s automation may make this course of simpler. As an alternative of counting on handbook spreadsheets to maintain observe of withheld quantities and launch dates, the system handles that robotically. I can see how this is able to make closing funds extra predictable for subcontractors and cut back the danger of disputes over excellent balances.

One concern I’ve seen talked about is that GCPay’s buyer help can typically reply slowly. If a problem impacts funds, I think about ready a number of days for a decision can be irritating. Since building finance is usually time-sensitive, any delays in getting technical help may create bottlenecks within the fee course of.

GCPay is designed to streamline customary fee workflows, which could make it much less versatile for firms with distinctive processes. If a contractor must deal with partial funds, particular approval constructions, or different exceptions, the system could not all the time accommodate these simply. I feel having to work round these limitations may result in additional handbook work, defeating a few of the function of automation.

One other disadvantage appears to be that adjustments made in an accounting system don’t all the time sync seamlessly with GCPay. If value codes, vendor particulars, or fee phrases are up to date in the primary accounting software program, they won’t robotically replicate in GCPay. That would result in discrepancies requiring handbook fixes, an additional step that customers in all probability wouldn’t count on. I can see how irritating this is able to be, particularly if an organization depends on the software program to supply an correct, up-to-date image of its financials.

What I dislike about GCPay:

• A sluggish response from buyer help could possibly be an actual difficulty when funds are at stake. If an issue prevents an bill from being processed, I think about ready days for a decision can be irritating.
• Whereas I like how GCPay automates many customary fee processes, it could not go well with firms with distinctive workflows. The system’s inflexible construction may develop into difficult if a contractor must deal with partial funds, particular approval chains, or different exceptions.

What G2 customers dislike about GCPay:

“There are specific points that GCPay lacks, reminiscent of flexibility for personalization. The software program just isn’t very versatile, which means that typically we can’t get it to work in methods which might be excellent for what we wish. This has prompted some inconveniences to our operations as a enterprise entity. Additionally, the client help could be much less responsive than anticipated. There have additionally been situations the place fixing a few of these challenges was a bit sluggish, thus making it troublesome to reply to issues as and after they come up.”

– GCPay Assessment, Enrique E.

One factor I admire about Sage Intacct is how environment friendly journal entries are. The system streamlines the method, making it simple to enter, edit, and evaluate transactions with out pointless delays. This effectivity makes monetary monitoring a lot smoother for a building enterprise coping with frequent value changes, payroll entries, and income recognition.

I like how Sage Intacct permits building accountants to deal with a number of points of a single bill in a single place. In building, invoices usually embody a number of value classes—supplies, labor, subcontractors, and overhead—so managing them with out switching between totally different modules saves time. As an alternative of bouncing backwards and forwards between totally different instruments, I admire the power to handle advanced transactions from a single interface.

I admire how Sage Intacct can scale as a building enterprise grows. In contrast to some accounting options that develop into cumbersome with elevated transactions and tasks, this method can deal with increasing operations with out dropping effectivity. The software program would not decelerate or develop into more durable to make use of because the variety of tasks, subcontractors, and workers will increase.

Compliance with monetary rules, tax legal guidelines, and industry-specific accounting requirements is all the time a priority in building. Sage Intacct has built-in compliance options that assist guarantee transactions and reviews align with required requirements. This implies fewer complications when coping with audits, tax filings, or regulatory adjustments. I like that accountants don’t should spend as a lot time double-checking whether or not the monetary information are assembly compliance necessities.

I’ve observed some customers complain that looking out transactions could be tougher than it must be. When coping with building tasks, it’s widespread to have quite a few transactions tied to totally different distributors, tasks, and job websites. It slows monetary administration if I can’t rapidly pull up a selected transaction based mostly on a number of standards.

Whereas I perceive the necessity for accounting controls, I discover it irritating that Sage Intacct has limitations when modifying posted transactions. In building, surprising adjustments occur consistently—value changes, incorrect entries, or reclassifications are simply a part of the job. Nevertheless, if I make a mistake or must appropriate a posting, the system’s restrictions could make it extra difficult than essential.

Whereas customization is feasible, I don’t discover the built-in reviews significantly helpful for construction-specific accounting wants. Many building companies depend on job costing, work-in-progress monitoring, and retention reporting, however Sage Intacct doesn’t present these out of the field in a means that feels tailor-made for the {industry}.

What I dislike about Sage Intacct:

• I’ve observed some customers point out that trying to find particular transactions in Sage Intacct could be tougher than anticipated.
• Whereas I perceive the significance of sustaining accounting controls, I discover it regarding that Sage Intacct has limitations relating to modifying posted transactions.

What G2 customers dislike about Sage Intacct:

“Within the Reporting part, we face a number of points. For instance, we can’t simply examine YTD to LYTD. Generally, contacting buyer help is troublesome as there’s no correct chat service the place we are able to report issues and get options rapidly. Moreover, if the variety of transactions is excessive, the software program usually crashes whereas exporting them. Within the reviews part, totally different reviews typically present totally different balances, which creates confusion.”

– Sage Intacct Assessment, Pankaj P.

One of many issues I discover reassuring about Acumatica is its capacity to create a powerful audit path. Monetary transparency is crucial in building accounting, and having a system that tracks each transaction intimately is a giant plus. With a number of undertaking stakeholders, disputes over monetary information can develop into a nightmare, so I like that Acumatica helps stop these points.

From what I perceive, Acumatica doesn’t take ceaselessly to implement, and that’s an enormous benefit in building. Delays in rolling out new software program can create chaos, and I wouldn’t need to cope with that whereas managing energetic tasks. A quick implementation means you possibly can transition to payroll, invoicing, and price monitoring with out main disruptions.

Building accounting comes with a number of repetitive duties, and I don’t suppose it’s best to waste time on issues that must be automated. Acumatica’s automation options would prevent a number of effort on payroll processing and bill approvals. As an alternative of regularly double-checking numbers, I like Acumatica’s capacity to allow you to give attention to making monetary choices that impression undertaking success.

I like how Acumatica helps you to handle a number of tasks or entities beneath one system. Acumatica helps you to oversee financials throughout totally different enterprise models, which is essential in building, the place firms usually function beneath totally different authorized constructions. As an alternative of manually consolidating reviews, I can observe every thing in a single place, saving time and decreasing errors.

Whereas Acumatica permits for reporting, I’ve observed that it doesn’t include sufficient pre-built templates for construction-specific wants. I don’t need to spend additional time configuring job value breakdowns and compliance reviews when they need to be obtainable by default.

Though Acumatica helps multi-company accounting, it doesn’t appear as easy as I’d like. If I had been managing a number of building entities, I’d need intercompany transactions to be seamless, not one thing I’ve to navigate by means of workarounds. I’ve learn that sure processes like monetary consolidation would possibly take extra effort than anticipated.

Switching accounting software program isn’t simple, and I can see how migrating historic monetary information into Acumatica is likely to be irritating. If I had years of monetary information in one other system, I wouldn’t need to cope with formatting points or misplaced information. I’ve seen firms wrestle with this transition, and I’d moderately keep away from that headache.

What I dislike about Acumatica:

• I discover it irritating that Acumatica doesn’t have sufficient pre-built construction-specific report templates. I don’t need to spend time configuring job value breakdowns and compliance reviews when these must be prepared to make use of.
• Migrating historic monetary information into Acumatica looks like a significant problem. If I had years’ value of information in one other system, I wouldn’t need to cope with formatting points or the danger of dropping vital information.

What G2 customers dislike about Acumatica:

“It has been exhausting to import our historic information into Acumatica. This would come with previous quotes/orders/pictures that go along with previous orders.”

– Acumatica Assessment, Jamie B.

I like how Spectrum gives a full suite of accounting instruments tailor-made for the development {industry}. The software program offers strong capabilities that match industry-specific wants, from payroll administration to job costing. Having all monetary administration instruments in a single place reduces the necessity for a number of platforms. This may enhance workflow and guarantee consistency in monetary reporting.

Spectrum offers entry to vital monetary information from the workplace and the sphere. This cloud-based performance provides workers the pliability to handle payroll, evaluate invoices, and observe job prices with out being bodily current. Distant accessibility is especially helpful for firms managing a number of job websites.

The flexibility to observe job prices successfully is a significant power of Spectrum. I like how the software program helps customers monitor bills, labor prices, and general undertaking monetary well being. By breaking down prices intimately, firms can guarantee higher funds administration. Having clear visibility into undertaking spending helps stop value overruns.

A frequent grievance about Spectrum is that it might typically lag or decelerate, significantly when processing giant quantities of knowledge. I don’t like that sure actions, like producing reviews or getting into transactions rapidly, could cause noticeable delays. This may be irritating for groups that must course of monetary information effectively.

I’ve seen customers complain about Spectrum’s incapability to seamlessly combine with exterior reporting instruments, significantly Crystal Reviews. These counting on third-party reporting software program would possibly expertise frustration when integrating information. If an organization is used to working with a selected reporting format, this limitation may add additional work.

I don’t like Spectrum’s lack of correct multi-screen help. This may be a problem for accountants or monetary managers who should concurrently work with a number of paperwork and reviews. This limitation can decelerate effectivity in an {industry} the place fast entry to totally different datasets is essential.

What I dislike about Spectrum:

• I don’t like that Spectrum can typically lag, particularly when processing giant quantities of knowledge. Working reviews or getting into transactions rapidly can result in noticeable delays, which could be irritating for groups that depend on effectivity.
• Spectrum’s lack of multi-screen help is an obstacle. Having a number of reviews open without delay could be important when working with monetary information, and I don’t like the way in which this incapability means consistently switching between screens.

What I dislike about Spectrum:

“I want we may have a double-screen session, but it surely solely helps you to use one display screen.”

– Spectrum Assessment, Amy P.

One of many issues I admire about JobTread is the way it helps with value estimation and budgeting. Managing prices in building could be a nightmare, however this software program makes it simpler to trace bills earlier than a undertaking begins. I like that it lets customers see all projected prices in a single place, which reduces the danger of going over funds.

I all the time worth buyer help, and JobTread appears to get that proper. From what I’ve seen, their help staff is very engaged, and having a Fb group stuffed with different customers sharing their experiences is a big plus. I like figuring out that I don’t should determine every thing out by myself if I ever have a query.

I don’t like coping with messy spreadsheets and scattered job particulars, so I admire that JobTread retains every thing organized in a single place. Customers can observe job progress, handle paperwork, and talk with their staff with out switching between a number of platforms. Having a clear and easy interface permits them to spend much less time trying to find info and focusing extra on the work that issues.

Contracts and paperwork are simply a part of the job in building, and I understand how simple it’s for issues to get misplaced or missed. What I like about JobTread is that it centralizes all these vital paperwork, so customers don’t should dig by means of emails or file cupboards. Pulling up a contract or referencing a doc in seconds makes undertaking administration a lot smoother.

One limitation is the dearth of a totally developed takeoff function. Estimating supplies is a big a part of building, and never having this constructed into the software program means customers should depend on a separate software. I don’t like how that provides an additional step to the workflow.

Though JobTread is meant to be user-friendly, it nonetheless takes a while to get used to. Some options require a little bit of trial and error earlier than they really feel pure, which I’ve to think about.

Reporting is a giant deal in building accounting, and I like having the pliability to create detailed, custom-made reviews. I’ve seen that JobTread’s reporting instruments work nicely, however they don’t appear as customizable as I’d like. I would run into some limitations if I wanted extremely particular reviews—like detailed breakdowns of subcontractor prices or labor evaluation.

What I dislike about JobTread:

• One in every of my largest drawbacks is that JobTread doesn’t have a built-in takeoff function. Estimating supplies is a key a part of building, and never having this software means customers have to make use of one other software program for that step.
• Though JobTread is designed to be user-friendly, I can see how there’s nonetheless a studying curve. Some options don’t really feel instantly intuitive, so I’d must determine issues out.

What G2 customers dislike about JobTread:

“At present, I feel JobTread has essentially the most room for enchancment with picks/specs and in some areas with expense administration and invoicing (significantly with cost-plus). That being mentioned, I do know they’re presently engaged on updates to those options, so there is a good probability this may change within the subsequent few months!

And as a lot as I like that JobTread shows a lot info, there are some screens and dashboards I want had been a bit extra refined and user-friendly. Generally it might really feel a bit overwhelming at first (particularly for these not as tech-savvy), however you get used to it.”

– JobTread Assessment, Justin M.

Want software program for managing your entire building undertaking lifecycle? Try the greatest building ERP software program.