7 Finest PCB Design Software program I Suggest

My high 7 finest PCB design software program suggestions for 2025

What I search for in PCB design software program

The checklist beneath incorporates real consumer opinions from our greatest PCB design software program class web page. To qualify for inclusion within the class, a product should:

• Modify PCB layouts and PCB circuitry
• Embrace a elements library so customers can simply implement high-quality PCB footprints
• Present schematic enhancing instruments for modification {of electrical} properties and different attributes of elements, wires, nets, and pins.

This information has been pulled from G2 in 2025. Some opinions have been edited for readability.

Altium Designer affords a unified platform that integrates completely different design instruments, together with schematic seize, structure routing, documentation, and simulation, into one atmosphere. What I recognize most is the power to seamlessly transfer between these phases. For instance, as soon as I create the schematic diagram, I can simply transition to the layout-routing section, adjusting the design whereas visualizing the ultimate product. This clean workflow saves me time and helps me hold every little thing organized while not having to change between a number of instruments or fear about integration points.

A function that basically impressed me is design for manufacturing (DFM). This ensures that designs aren’t solely useful but additionally simple to supply. The DFM instruments assist establish potential points early within the course of, lowering errors and saving time in the course of the manufacturing section. It’s reassuring to know that my design is optimized for manufacturing earlier than transferring on to precise fabrication.

With the 3D flex-rigid design, I used to be in a position to visualize how the completely different layers of a PCB interacted, together with each versatile and inflexible components. This was particularly helpful when testing extra complicated, multi-layered designs. I can see how seeing how every part interacts in 3D may give producers higher perception and assist them make extra knowledgeable choices whereas routing the structure.

Its intensive part library affords an enormous collection of components, elements, and templates, which allowed me to shortly discover what I wanted. This function reduces the necessity to manually design elements from scratch, and I used to be in a position to make use of pre-validated components that helped reduce errors. The big variety made the method quicker and extra dependable, which is all the time a plus.

The largest problem I confronted was the system necessities. Altium Designer requires plenty of reminiscence and processing energy. On high-end machines, the software program runs easily, however on much less highly effective computer systems, I skilled noticeable slowdowns, particularly when coping with bigger, extra complicated tasks.

Attempting to run a number of instruments without delay typically resulted in lag, which made the expertise irritating. For customers with much less highly effective methods, this might actually impression workflow and productiveness.

One other ache level for me was including footprints to units. Whereas Altium affords a big collection of footprints, the method felt a bit cumbersome. Discovering the best footprint requires navigating by way of a number of libraries, and there isn’t a easy option to view all obtainable choices for a part in a single place.

Linking the footprint to the schematic image additionally felt disjointed, because it wasn’t all the time clear if the right one was chosen. There wasn’t a simple option to confirm the accuracy of the footprint after it was added, which led to some additional steps to make sure every little thing was accurately aligned. I discovered this to be time-consuming and a bit irritating, particularly when attempting to work effectively.

The studying curve can be one thing to remember. Altium Designer is full of options, which is nice for skilled customers however may be overwhelming for rookies like me. The interface is filled with choices, and it took me a major period of time to familiarize myself with all of the instruments.

What I dislike about Altium Designer:

• The system necessities for Altium Designer had been difficult for me, because it requires plenty of reminiscence and processing energy. On much less highly effective computer systems, I skilled slowdowns and lag, which considerably impacted my workflow, particularly with bigger, extra complicated tasks.
• Including footprints to units was a irritating course of for me. Navigating by way of a number of libraries and linking the footprint to the schematic image wasn’t simple, and I discovered myself spending additional time verifying every little thing was right, which slowed me down.

What G2 customers dislike about Altium Designer:

“One space for enchancment is including extra options to the “Producer Half Search.” Moreover, navigating the software program with no mouse may be difficult, particularly when utilizing a laptop computer. Proper-clicking and dragging on a trackpad may be irritating, although that’s partly because of the laptop computer design. One other suggestion pertains to defining board measurement; for example, once I wanted a board that was precisely 50mm x 50mm, it was onerous to attract exact traces. I ended up setting the grid measurement to 1mm and estimating the scale. It will be useful to have a function that shows the size of line drawings or the scale of the shapes being created.”

– Altium Designer Assessment, Trevor M.

One of many standout options of Altium 365 is its real-time collaboration capabilities. It helped me join with circuit groups on the identical designs concurrently. Whether or not I used to be reviewing schematics or making PCB structure changes, it ensured everybody was on the identical web page. The platform’s model management system ensured that each change is tracked, which allowed me to view revision histories or roll again to earlier variations with ease.

It has extremely environment friendly mission administration instruments which have made dealing with complicated designs a lot simpler, particularly once I’m engaged on intricate designs. I discovered the method of making and modifying elements to be each intuitive and highly effective, permitting for detailed work with out feeling overwhelming. I can see how this flexibility could be an enormous asset for groups, enabling them to handle large-scale tasks with ease.

I’ve additionally actually loved working with the PCB structure editor. It’s extremely customizable, which permits me to make changes to designs shortly and seamlessly. I actually appreciated the power to effortlessly transition between schematic and PCB. It saved me plenty of time, as I might shortly modify and export designs. For groups that have to combine these modifications into their bigger platform-based tasks, this function would make the whole course of rather more environment friendly, notably when fast changes are required.

The 3D visualization function was one other space the place Altium 365 impressed me. I used to be in a position to visualize how elements match on the board with ease, particularly in tight areas. The software program’s assist for .step 3D our bodies made it simple to see how every little thing would match collectively. What stood out was the 3D rendering velocity – even when working with complicated elements, they rendered shortly with none noticeable lag. I discovered the “snap factors” function notably helpful, because it helped me place even probably the most awkward 3D our bodies with nice precision.

Lastly, the draftsman instrument has been an absolute spotlight. Producing high-quality meeting drawings was a breeze with just some clicks. This instrument allowed me to create detailed and visually interesting drawings, which I might think about could be very useful for manufacturing groups that want clear documentation for meeting.

Nevertheless, regardless of these constructive experiences, there are a number of areas the place I feel Altium 365 might enhance. One of many challenges I confronted was with organising PCB routing guidelines. It required a little bit of programming data, which could not be beginner-friendly. Whereas I ultimately grew to become proficient, I might see how somebody new to this kind of design software program would possibly discover this function a bit difficult. A extra user-friendly interface for setting these guidelines would definitely make the method smoother for rookies.

One other problem I encountered was with the design rule system. Some customized queries didn’t work as anticipated, notably when attempting to arrange guidelines to disregard interfering elements. For instance, I created a “part clearance” rule with particular settings for vertical and horizontal clearance, however the rule didn’t constantly ignore collisions. Regardless of prioritizing the rule accurately, it didn’t work on some events, which was irritating.

I additionally bumped into a problem with observe size calculation. There have been occasions when Altium appeared to disregard small segments of the observe on sure layers, which could possibly be problematic when attempting to exactly match observe lengths, particularly for impedance-controlled designs. This led to inaccuracies within the structure, requiring me to manually modify and double-check sure areas.

On a number of events, Altium 365 additionally skilled reminiscence violation errors, which had been a bit regarding given the software program’s complexity. Whereas it labored properly for many of my tasks, bigger and extra complicated designs brought about the instrument to decelerate, particularly when working over a community. This resulted in longer load occasions and delays in accessing information, which could possibly be irritating throughout tight mission timelines.

Lastly, the Invoice of Supplies (BOM) function took longer than anticipated to generate. Moreover, it wanted to be up to date each time I made modifications to the schematic, which added delays to the workflow, particularly when working with frequent design revisions.

What I dislike about Altium 365:

• The setup of PCB routing guidelines required some programming data, which wasn’t very beginner-friendly, making the training curve steeper for brand new customers. A extra user-friendly interface for these guidelines would enhance the expertise for these simply beginning out.
• I encountered points with the design rule system. Customized queries typically didn’t work as anticipated, particularly with part clearance guidelines, inflicting frustration when the foundations didn’t constantly forestall collisions.

What G2 customers dislike about Altium 365:

“The software program may be gradual to start out and entry information, particularly over a community. Some default settings, just like the connection matrix, generate pointless warnings that make it more durable to establish actual points. The Invoice of Supplies function takes time to generate and requires updates when modifications are made to the schematic. Moreover, the software program slows down with bigger designs, and whereas it integrates properly with third-party elements, occasional points with mismatched footprints or image requirements can come up.”

– Altium 365 Assessment, Hemant A.

What I dislike about PADS Skilled:

• The outdated GUI felt much less partaking and lacked intuitiveness, making it more durable for me to navigate and totally benefit from the consumer expertise in comparison with trendy PCB design instruments.
• Because of its complexity, organising the instrument initially was overwhelming, and a extra streamlined method would have saved me time and diminished frustration in the course of the onboarding course of.

What G2 customers dislike about PADS Skilled:

“One draw back of utilizing PADS Skilled is that it takes a major period of time to course of and compute analyses, even for one thing so simple as the dashboard, which may be fairly irritating.”

– PADS Skilled Assessment, Souvik G.

I lately explored Allegro X PCB Designer, and I discovered it distinctive for creating CPU motherboards and dealing with high-density interconnect (HDI) PCB designs.

Its capability to develop compact, space-efficient electronics whereas sustaining superior performance is spectacular. The instrument makes it doable to pack intricate elements into smaller areas, a function that basically stood out to me and felt like a major benefit for contemporary electronics design.

One in every of my favourite options was the error correction system for schematic design. With its three-step course of, it made guaranteeing schematic accuracy really feel intuitive and easy. It flagged errors early, corrected them logically, and validated the outcomes systematically, streamlining the design course of and minimizing potential errors.

I additionally appreciated the pre-analysis and post-analysis capabilities, which allowed me to catch and resolve points each earlier than and after the design section, making the whole workflow extra environment friendly and dependable.

The AI-based part automated the method of arranging parts on the PCB, saving me appreciable time. This automation additionally ensured exact and optimized placements that will usually require meticulous guide changes. It felt just like the instrument was doing the heavy lifting, leaving me free to deal with different elements of the design.

I used to be additionally impressed by Allegro’s versatile workspace, which allowed me to customise the interface, instructions, and workflows to suit my private preferences. This adaptability was an enormous plus, because it made staying organized and productive a lot simpler. Aligning the instrument’s setup with my design habits felt like an effective way to enhance effectivity and luxury.

Nevertheless, the lengthy load occasions, particularly throughout resource-heavy operations, had been irritating. Whether or not it was beginning the appliance, creating library symbols, or working with elements, I seen vital lag. This problem grew to become notably noticeable when dealing with a number of 3D fashions or board mapping, which took for much longer than anticipated and felt like a bottleneck within the workflow.

One other limitation I noticed was the dearth of complete design for manufacturing (DFM) experiences. Whereas the instrument excels at creating PCBs, it doesn’t generate the detailed DFM experiences wanted to make sure a design is prepared for manufacturing. I had to make use of exterior instruments to fill this hole, which added an additional step and a few inconvenience.

Safety issues additionally stood out. The cadence.pcb information aren’t protected properly and may be simply reverse-engineered. For these working with delicate designs, this lack of strong safety might pose vital dangers.

Moreover, the absence of a direct VBScript interface means customers would possibly have to study a brand new scripting language unique to Allegro. Whereas this may be useful for superior customization, the training curve felt unnecessarily steep, particularly for individuals who aren’t acquainted with Allegro’s scripting atmosphere.

What I dislike about Allegro X PCB Designer:

• Throughout my testing, I seen vital delays when performing resource-heavy duties like dealing with 3D fashions or board mapping. These lengthy load occasions made the workflow really feel much less environment friendly.
• I discovered the absence of complete DFM experiences limiting. To completely assess my take a look at designs for manufacturing readiness, I needed to discover exterior instruments, which added pointless complexity.

What G2 customers dislike about Allegro X PCB Designer:

“The software program must be backward suitable with older revisions. It requires switching between completely different toolsets, and the whole workflow is not simply built-in. STEP export information do not work properly with SolidWorks, and managing libraries and variants may be troublesome.”

– Allegro X PCB Designer Assessment, Vijay P.

Throughout my testing of Autodesk Fusion, I explored a wide range of options, and it is clear that the software program has so much to supply manufacturing groups.

One facet that stood out to me was the 3D design and modeling instruments. These instruments are extremely highly effective and permit for the creation of each easy components and complicated buildings.

A function I discovered notably useful is manufacturing integration. Fusion permits designs to be taken instantly by way of to manufacturing, which simplifies the method. As an alternative of switching between a number of platforms for design and manufacturing, every little thing is consolidated in a single place. For manufacturing groups, this function is invaluable because it reduces the probabilities of errors and ensures all components of the method are streamlined.

Fusion’s simulation and evaluation instruments enable for simulations like stress exams and movement evaluation, serving to manufacturing groups take a look at designs digitally earlier than transferring to manufacturing. By figuring out potential points, these instruments saved me time, whilst a newbie. 

One of the modern options I examined was generative design. This instrument permits me to enter design targets and constraints, and Fusion then generates a number of design choices that meet these standards. For manufacturing groups, this may be extremely helpful for exploring new design prospects and optimizing effectivity, because the software program suggests design options which may not have been thought of in any other case.

Nevertheless, I did encounter a number of challenges throughout testing. Assemblies in Fusion may be troublesome to handle, particularly when coping with bigger designs. Organizing and navigating by way of the completely different components can turn out to be cumbersome, and it may be onerous to shortly find particular elements when changes are wanted. 

One other space the place I encountered some issue was with 2D drawings. Whereas Fusion does provide fundamental instruments for creating 2D drawings from 3D fashions, I discovered that the choices obtainable for detailed 2D designs had been restricted. For extra intricate drawings, I needed to export the design to AutoCAD to reap the benefits of extra superior instruments. This lack of flexibility within the 2D instruments could possibly be improved for manufacturing groups that want detailed and complicated 2D representations.

Lastly, I bumped into some points with file conversion when exporting designs. Regardless of Fusion supporting many file codecs, I seen that some intricate particulars and geometries had been misplaced when the designs had been imported into different software program. This could possibly be an issue for manufacturing groups that want exact, detailed designs preserved throughout completely different instruments.

What I dislike about Autodesk Fusion:

• Throughout my testing, I discovered it difficult to handle assemblies, particularly with bigger designs. Organizing and navigating by way of components grew to become cumbersome, and finding particular elements shortly was troublesome.
• I encountered limitations with 2D drawings, the place Fusion’s fundamental instruments weren’t sufficient for creating detailed 2D representations. I needed to export designs to AutoCAD for extra superior choices, which added an additional step to the method.

What G2 customers dislike about Autodesk Fusion:

“Two elements of Autodesk Fusion 360 that I discover much less favorable are its reliance on an web connection and its CAD file compatibility. Whereas being cloud-based affords vital advantages, options like real-time collaboration and computerized saving may be difficult in areas with restricted connectivity. Moreover, though Fusion 360 helps many file codecs, the conversion course of throughout export is commonly restricted, resulting in the lack of particulars or geometries when importing information into different software program.”

– Autodesk Fusion Assessment, Juan M.

After testing Altium CircuitMaker, I can confidently say that this instrument has so much to supply, notably for these engaged on circuit design. I discovered a number of options that basically stood out, though I additionally encountered a number of challenges alongside the best way.

One of many options I appreciated probably the most was the cloud integration. This allowed me to retailer all designs securely within the cloud, making them accessible from wherever. It was extremely handy, as I did not have to fret about shedding my work or managing cupboard space on my native machine. Moreover, the power to collaborate simply with others is a large plus. Whether or not you are working remotely or on a team-based mission, this cloud function makes it seamless to share and work on designs collectively. The cloud-based nature additionally means I did not need to manually again up my information, which saved a major period of time.

One other function that basically made a distinction was the Fusion 360 plugin. This plugin allowed me to effortlessly bridge the hole between digital and mechanical designs. I might work on my circuit design in CircuitMaker after which seamlessly transfer to Fusion 360 to tweak the mechanical elements or vice versa. This fluid integration between the 2 platforms saved me hours of transforming and resolving alignment points, guaranteeing that my digital and mechanical designs aligned completely.

The 3D know-how for visualizing schematics was additionally a game-changer. Seeing designs in 3D helped me perceive how the circuits would work together as soon as they had been bodily constructed. It offered me with a a lot clearer image than conventional 2D views, and I used to be in a position to spot potential errors early on which may have been missed in a 2D atmosphere.

I additionally actually appreciated the power to simply assign properties to elements. Including feedback or particular attributes to components helped me keep organized and hold observe of modifications all through the design course of. It was notably helpful for leaving reminders to myself or others about sure design choices or particular components, guaranteeing nothing was missed.

The library that comes pre-loaded with Altium CircuitMaker is intensive and a real-time-saver. It consists of a variety of symbols, footprints, and 3D fashions, so I didn’t need to go attempting to find components. I might entry not solely the components themselves but additionally vital particulars like costing, stock info, and even distributor solutions. This made the designal course of a lot simpler, particularly once I didn’t have a pre-defined components checklist. I might shortly pull up related elements and begin designing with out losing time on analysis or stock checks.

Nevertheless, there have been some challenges. Whereas the simulator mannequin works properly for fundamental simulations, I discovered that the accuracy wasn’t all the time dependable for extra complicated circuits. The simulations typically didn’t precisely replicate real-world habits, which made me query whether or not a number of the designs would perform as anticipated as soon as constructed. This could possibly be problematic for extra intricate designs the place exact habits is crucial.

One other problem I confronted was the shortcoming to save lots of my tasks offline. Because the mission file needed to be saved within the cloud, I couldn’t work with out an web connection. This was notably inconvenient once I was in an space with poor connectivity or once I simply needed the flexibleness to work offline. Whereas the cloud integration is nice total, I might have most popular the choice to save lots of tasks domestically for added flexibility and safety.

Moreover, I discovered the heavy reliance on neighborhood sharing to be a little bit of a disadvantage. Whereas the concept of sharing work with a big consumer base may be interesting to some, I personally favor extra management over my tasks. The community-driven facet felt a bit limiting, and I might have favored extra independence in how my work is shared or stored non-public. For individuals who take pleasure in working independently, this could possibly be a deal-breaker.

Lastly, as a Linux and MacOS consumer, I discovered the expertise lower than very best. Since CircuitMaker is primarily designed for Home windows, I hadvert to arrange a digital machine to run the software program. Whereas it labored high quality throughout the digital machine, it added an additional layer of complexity to the setup. It wasn’t as seamless as utilizing a local software, and I might see how this could possibly be irritating for customers exterior of the Home windows ecosystem.

What I dislike about Altium CircuitMaker:

• I encountered points with simulation accuracy for complicated circuits. The simulator typically didn’t precisely replicate real-world habits, which raised issues in regards to the reliability of designs for extra intricate tasks.
• The shortcoming to save lots of tasks offline was a serious inconvenience. Because the information needed to be saved within the cloud, I couldn’t work with out an web connection, which restricted my flexibility in sure conditions.

What G2 customers dislike about Altium CircuitMaker:

“CircuitMaker enforces cloud saving and permits solely two non-public tasks, which may be limiting. The neighborhood part library is unmoderated, containing many unusable footprints (although it is beneficial to create your individual, because the part wizard makes it simple). The software program may be considerably unstable, so saving steadily is vital. Moreover, the keyboard shortcuts differ from these in Altium Designer, which can take a while to regulate to.”

– Altium CircuitMaker Assessment, Alberto V.

One function of Autodesk EAGLE that stood out to me nearly instantly was the consumer language applications (ULP), the built-in programming language. It helped me save time by automating repetitive processes, which might be useful when engaged on a number of designs or making frequent changes. I might create customized scripts tailor-made to my wants, giving me larger management over the workflow. For manufacturing groups seeking to velocity up manufacturing, this function generally is a real-time-saver.

The autoroute perform is one other instrument that simplifies the design course of. In a producing context, the place time is vital, the power to shortly route paths with minimal guide effort was invaluable. It allowed me to generate fast prototypes and focus extra on refining the core design reasonably than coping with routing points.

The instrument labored easily for schematic seize, which is essential in manufacturing for guaranteeing accuracy. It helped me spot potential points early, lowering the probability of errors throughout manufacturing.

On the library administration aspect, Autodesk EAGLE impressed me with its intensive collection of pre-loaded CAD packages. This meant much less time spent looking for elements, permitting for quicker meeting and prototyping in manufacturing.

One draw back I encountered was with the 3D visualizer. Whereas useful, it didn’t provide the extent of accuracy I anticipated when visualizing how a PCB would look as soon as produced. In manufacturing, this stage of precision is crucial to make sure every little thing matches collectively accurately, and EAGLE’s 3D instrument didn’t fairly meet these expectations.

I additionally had points with the web itemizing function, particularly when working with complicated energy PCBs. It didn’t all the time perform as anticipated, which led to delays and potential errors within the design section. Dependable web listings are important for guaranteeing correct electrical connections within the closing product.

One other limitation was the restriction within the downloaded model of EAGLE, which limits designs to simply two layers. This turns into a problem when working with extra complicated, multi-layer boards. For manufacturing groups engaged on high-density designs, this restriction could cause delays, forcing groups to discover various options or go for dearer variations of the software program.

Lastly, I really feel that routing intelligence could possibly be improved. Presently, EAGLE makes use of normal routing paths, however integrating AI-based routing algorithms would considerably enhance effectivity. This might lead to extra compact, optimized designs, velocity up manufacturing occasions, and reduce routing-related errors.

What I dislike about Autodesk EAGLE:

• I discovered the 3D visualizer to be a bit missing in accuracy. It didn’t present the extent of precision I wanted to visualise how the PCB would look as soon as produced, which might result in potential fitment points within the manufacturing section.
• I encountered points with the web itemizing function, notably when working with complicated energy PCBs. It didn’t all the time work as anticipated, which brought about delays and will have led to errors in guaranteeing correct electrical connections for the ultimate product.

What G2 customers dislike about Autodesk EAGLE:

“The system’s session timeout is sort of restrictive, because the platform prompts session expiration after a brief interval. It will be useful if there have been an choice to increase the session period, giving customers extra flexibility to finish duties with out the priority of shedding their progress.” 

– Autodesk EAGLE Assessment, Aryan Ok.

Most high-quality PCB design software program instruments are paid, however many provide free trials that will help you get began. Altium Designer, for instance, is broadly considered the most effective instruments within the {industry}, providing highly effective options for complicated designs. Its free trial generally is a good place to begin. Discover extra free PCB design software program that provides fundamental options, which may be helpful for easier tasks or rookies.

Preserve issues grounded

Selecting the best PCB design software program generally is a game-changer on your tasks. When evaluating these instruments, it’s important to think about elements like usability, efficiency, and options that finest align along with your particular wants—whether or not that’s dealing with complicated designs, bettering sign integrity, or guaranteeing clean collaboration.

Based mostly on my testing and consumer suggestions, I’ve outlined the highest instruments that supply the very best mixture of effectivity, flexibility, and energy. One of the best instrument is the one which works for you and helps you deliver your PCB designs to life with none hiccups.

Don’t be afraid to dive in, experiment with completely different choices, and see what clicks. Keep in mind, even probably the most refined software program can’t assist when you don’t press the best buttons (except you’ve received a “design wizard” in your group, by which case, please share their contact data with me).

Cut back errors through the use of simulation and take a look at suites earlier than transferring your PCB design to manufacturing.